No — not on this device

Ornith 1.5 397B-A17B at Q4_K_M needs 224.1 GB against 204.8 GB usable, and the shortfall of 19.3 GB is more than 16 GB of system RAM can cover at a tolerable speed. A smaller sibling or a lower quantisation is the honest answer here.

Does not fit 8K context Q4_K_M · 223.2 GB MIT Released 19 Aug 2026 New this week

The flagship Ornith on the Qwen3.5 397B-A17B architecture, MIT-licensed. A 256 GB Mac Studio at Q4, and it is in the Ollama library.

What hardware do I need for Ornith 1.5 397B-A17B? →

Fits instead: Ornith 1.5 35B-A3B (20.9 GB) · Ornith 1.5 9B (6.1 GB)

The VRAM budget

weights 223.2 GB
Weights 223.2 GB KV cache @ 8K 0.23 GB Runtime overhead 0.6 GB Over budget 19.3 GB past 204.8 GB

Quantisation ladder

QuantWeightsTotal @ 8KMax contextTok/sQualityFit
Q8_0 392.8 GB 393.7 GB ~3.4 −0.1% ppl 188.9 GB over
Q6_K 303.2 GB 304.0 GB ~4.4 −0.4% ppl 99.2 GB over
Q5_K_M 262.0 GB 262.9 GB ~5.1 −0.8% ppl 58.1 GB over
Q4_K_M 223.2 GB 224.1 GB ~6.0 −1.9% ppl 19.3 GB over
Q3_K_M 180.7 GB 181.5 GB 256K 7.4 −5.4% ppl Long context
Q2_K 154.8 GB 155.7 GB 256K 8.6 −15% ppl Long context

Quality is the published perplexity delta against f16 weights. Max context assumes an f16 KV cache; q8_0 roughly doubles it. Only 15 of its 60 blocks keep a per-token KV cache; the rest are linear-attention, Mamba or convolution blocks with a fixed-size state.

How to run it

terminal
$ llama-server \
    -hf ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-397B:Q4_K_M \
    -c 8192 -ngl 54

The engine underneath most of the others. Every knob is exposed. More on llama.cpp.

01Download is 223.2 GB. Keep it on an SSD — a first load off a spinning disk takes minutes.
02With no GPU, thread count matters more than clock. Start at one thread per physical core.
03If it falls back to CPU silently, drop the context first, then step down a quantisation.
See all models for this rig Compare with another model