No — not on this device

Llama 4 Scout 109B-A17B at Q4_K_M needs 63.4 GB against 51.2 GB usable, and the shortfall of 12.2 GB is more than 16 GB of system RAM can cover at a tolerable speed. A smaller sibling or a lower quantisation is the honest answer here.

Does not fit 8K context Q4_K_M · 61.3 GB Llama 4 Community Released 5 Apr 2025 Vision

A 10M-token window on paper, chunked attention in practice (8K chunks on 3 of 4 layers). Needs 64 GB+ at Q4.

What hardware do I need for Llama 4 Scout 109B-A17B? →

Fits instead: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (42.8 GB) · Llama 3.1 8B Instruct (6.1 GB)

The VRAM budget

weights 61.3 GB
Weights 61.3 GB KV cache @ 8K 1.50 GB Runtime overhead 0.6 GB Over budget 12.2 GB past 51.2 GB

Quantisation ladder

QuantWeightsTotal @ 8KMax contextTok/sQualityFit
Q8_0 107.9 GB 110.0 GB ~1.0 −0.1% ppl 58.8 GB over
Q6_K 83.2 GB 85.3 GB ~1.3 −0.4% ppl 34.1 GB over
Q5_K_M 71.9 GB 74.0 GB ~1.5 −0.8% ppl 22.8 GB over
Q4_K_M 61.3 GB 63.4 GB ~1.8 −1.9% ppl 12.2 GB over
Q3_K_M 49.6 GB 51.7 GB 5K ~2.2 −5.4% ppl 0.5 GB over
Q2_K 42.5 GB 44.6 GB 148K 2.5 −15% ppl Long context

Quality is the published perplexity delta against f16 weights. Max context assumes an f16 KV cache; q8_0 roughly doubles it. This model interleaves sliding-window layers (8192 tokens, 12 of 48 layers global), which is why its cache barely grows with context.

How to run it

terminal
$ llama-server \
    -hf meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct:Q4_K_M \
    -c 8192 -ngl 38

The engine underneath most of the others. Every knob is exposed. More on llama.cpp.

01Download is 61.3 GB. Keep it on an SSD — a first load off a spinning disk takes minutes.
02With no GPU, thread count matters more than clock. Start at one thread per physical core.
03If it falls back to CPU silently, drop the context first, then step down a quantisation.
See all models for this rig Compare with another model