No — not on this device

Ling 3.0 Flash 124B-A5B at Q4_K_M needs 70.4 GB against 25.6 GB usable, and the shortfall of 44.8 GB is more than 32 GB of system RAM can cover at a tolerable speed. A smaller sibling or a lower quantisation is the honest answer here.

Does not fit 8K context Q4_K_M · 69.7 GB MIT Released 2 Aug 2026 New this month Not in the Ollama library

A 124B hybrid (5 linear-attention layers per MLA layer) with 5.1B active: SWE-bench Pro 56.6 and AIME 93 claimed. Built for 96–128 GB machines.

What hardware do I need for Ling 3.0 Flash 124B-A5B? →

Fits instead: Ling 3.0 Tiny 7.9B-A1.3B (5.1 GB)

The VRAM budget

weights 69.7 GB
Weights 69.7 GB KV cache @ 8K 0.06 GB Runtime overhead 0.6 GB Over budget 44.8 GB past 25.6 GB

Quantisation ladder

QuantWeightsTotal @ 8KMax contextTok/sQualityFit
Q8_0 122.7 GB 123.4 GB ~1.9 −0.1% ppl 97.8 GB over
Q6_K 94.7 GB 95.4 GB ~2.4 −0.4% ppl 69.8 GB over
Q5_K_M 81.8 GB 82.5 GB ~2.8 −0.8% ppl 56.9 GB over
Q4_K_M 69.7 GB 70.4 GB ~3.3 −1.9% ppl 44.8 GB over
Q3_K_M 56.4 GB 57.1 GB ~4.1 −5.4% ppl 31.5 GB over
Q2_K 48.4 GB 49.0 GB ~4.8 −15% ppl 23.4 GB over

Quality is the published perplexity delta against f16 weights. Max context assumes an f16 KV cache; q8_0 roughly doubles it. Only 7 of its 42 blocks keep a per-token KV cache; the rest are linear-attention, Mamba or convolution blocks with a fixed-size state. This model uses multi-head latent attention, so its cache is a compressed latent rather than full K and V.

How to run it

terminal
$ llama-server \
    -hf inclusionAI/Ling-3.0-flash:Q4_K_M \
    -c 8192 -ngl 15

The engine underneath most of the others. Every knob is exposed. More on llama.cpp.

01Download is 69.7 GB. Keep it on an SSD — a first load off a spinning disk takes minutes.
02With no GPU, thread count matters more than clock. Start at one thread per physical core.
03If it falls back to CPU silently, drop the context first, then step down a quantisation.
See all models for this rig Compare with another model