No — not on this device

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B-A16B at Q4_K_M needs 311.0 GB against 7.0 GB usable, and the shortfall of 304.0 GB is more than 32 GB of system RAM can cover at a tolerable speed. A smaller sibling or a lower quantisation is the honest answer here.

Does not fit 8K context Q4_K_M · 310.4 GB MIT Released 10 Sep 2026 New this month Vision Not in the Ollama library

Twice V4 Flash's backbone (552B, 16B active per generated token) plus 196B of Engram lookup tables (189 GiB at FP8) that DwarfStar streams from SSD, so they are not counted here. A 512 GB Mac model, and as of October 2026 no mainline llama.cpp or Ollama build: DwarfStar on a Mac, vLLM across four GPUs. DeepSeek puts the cache at 890 bytes/token; modelled conservatively as 4 latent layers plus a 128-token window.

What hardware do I need for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B-A16B? →

The VRAM budget

weights 310.4 GB
Weights 310.4 GB KV cache @ 8K 0.04 GB Runtime overhead 0.6 GB Over budget 304.0 GB past 7.0 GB

Quantisation ladder

QuantWeightsTotal @ 8KMax contextTok/sQualityFit
Q8_0 546.2 GB 546.9 GB — ~0.9 −0.1% ppl 539.9 GB over
Q6_K 421.6 GB 422.2 GB — ~1.2 −0.4% ppl 415.2 GB over
Q5_K_M 364.4 GB 365.0 GB — ~1.3 −0.8% ppl 358.0 GB over
Q4_K_M 310.4 GB 311.0 GB — ~1.6 −1.9% ppl 304.0 GB over
Q3_K_M 251.3 GB 251.9 GB — ~2.0 −5.4% ppl 244.9 GB over
Q2_K 215.3 GB 215.9 GB — ~2.3 −15% ppl 208.9 GB over

Quality is the published perplexity delta against f16 weights. Max context assumes an f16 KV cache; q8_0 roughly doubles it. This model interleaves sliding-window layers (128 tokens, 4 of 40 layers global), which is why its cache barely grows with context. This model uses multi-head latent attention, so its cache is a compressed latent rather than full K and V.

How to run it

None of the runtimes we cover can load DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B-A16B on Intel hardware yet. Its model card says what does.

See all models for this rig Compare with another model